I'm currently riding with a gear ratio of 2.7 according to Sheldon Brown's fixed-gear calculator.

I have a 46 in the front and a 17 rear cog, I like it for around the city but its a little hard for me to skid and do more flatland stuff...

Anyone have any recommendations for a good setup for more flatland riding?

Tags: Brown, Sheldon, calculator, cog, flatland, gear, ratio, rear, skid, stop

Views: 1525

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

gain ratio or just gear ratio?
also- development is the one that matters.

at any time i'm running some combo of 40t or 48t x 13t, 16t, or 17t.
depends what i'm planning on needing.

usually my gain falls around 5-6.

unfortunately, i dont have the right combo to run 6.2 gain without only having 1 skid pad!
I rode a 40/18 for a bit but I couldn't get any speed so I have just recently switched out the 18 for a 15.

It’s a bit quicker now and just what I was looking for. I still may up the front to a 42 but I have not decided yet. Go ebay for cheap cogs.
I started with a 48/16, which as a tiny little dude was a bit much for me. Then I swtiched to a 46/16 and it was quite a bit better but still hard for me to lock in the skids sometimes. Now I'm riding the 44/16 and skids just lock right in but i am finding that it's a little slow for me sometimes. I guess its all about what you're looking for at the time. Somedays you want to go fast and others you want to flatland.
52-20bur ill lower it cause i have to lean all the way to the front to skid
Thanks for the advice, decided I'm going to stick with what I'm using now, don't have money to switch it up and beginning to get used to my set up.
I run 44:18, which is pretty good for SLO since we have a lot of hills. I can skid ok at lower speeds, but not at high speeds. My brother, who lives in the flat apocalypse of LA uses a 16:48, which works well for him.
Reb
I run 49 x 17 right now. Seems to work fine here in South East Michigan.
52x18 It may not always be the best ratio, but I'm so used to it that its beside the point. Plus people are always saying "damn, what a huge chainring" and stuff, which is fun.
42 x 14. but heading into the city (S.F.) works me too much. I got a 16 today, will put it on when go over there. Out in the east bay, 42 x 14 is good. It is flat, I can skid it, and race the cars down the arterial expressways and not spin out too bad
42 x 15 = Gear ratio of 2.8, Gain ratio of 5.9 - Perfect for mostly level inner city use.

In my opinion, a smallish chain ring with a sprocket no larger in diameter than the rear hub is the most aesthetically pleasing combination - it keeps the side-on silhouette uncluttered.
46:16 or 44:16
I used to ride my BMX with 44:16 and was quite comfortable, so i figured i'd start there when i started riding fixed. So far so good. I've heard larger rear cogs help you get more pop when your trying to wheelie and stuff
I have a 48 x 17 on the bike now, back "in the day" a 50x16 was used on flatland and a 50x18 was used when climbing in the foothills with a Suntour dual sprocket hub. I personally like the larger chainring in front, my feeling is that 'grunt' should have to be used after trackstanding through a traffic light.

RSS

© 2012   Created by Fixed Gear Republic.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service